Contacts
Get in touch
Close

Contacts

Romania, Cluj-Napoca – 400157
Str. Ploiești Nr. 9

Romania, Vama – 447350
Str. Fermei Nr. 14

+40 774 463 429

info@inteliscience.net

Rule-Based PMI Creation

Rule-Based PMI Creation

Rule-Based PMI Creation

Most PMI on a part is routine. Let rules prepare the routine — and keep your engineers for the judgement.

Rule-based PMI creation prepares the repetitive share of product manufacturing information in Siemens NX from your norms and templates: datum schemes per your family strategy, standard callouts for threads, fits and surfaces, note sets and model views per your MBD template — written as semantic PMI through NXOpen. The engineer then does what only an engineer can: adds the judgement-heavy tolerances, adjusts what the rule got generically right but specifically wrong, and releases. No magic, no percentages promised — time saved on the routine share, measured on your parts.

It is the “create” engine of our AI-Assisted Geometry Creation discipline — the rules-and-templates counterpart to the conversational MBD & PMI Authoring Assistant, and the creating counterpart to our MBD/PMI Compliance Automation, which checks what gets written.

Who this is for

  • Your MBD rollout keeps stalling on the same fact: annotating parts takes hours, and there are many parts.
  • Within a part family, most annotations follow the same pattern — and are still placed by hand every time.
  • Datum strategies and standard callouts exist in your norms, but applying them consistently depends on who annotates.
  • You want the annotation work reduced honestly — not a tool that claims to replace the engineer’s judgement.

// One flange housing — the rule set prepares, the engineer completes

Prepared by rules & templates
  • Datum scheme per family strategy (A: mounting face, B: pilot bore) · semantic
  • Standard callouts: threads, fits and surfaces per WN-311 series rules · semantic
  • Note set + model views per MBD template TN-12 · semantic
Completed by the engineer
  • Function-critical tolerances — the judgement the rule cannot make
  • Case-specific adjustments where the generic rule fits generically
  • Review & release — signed, logged, same responsibility as hand-made PMI
RELEASE Review & completeAdjust rulesDiscard

The honest split is the product. Rules prepare the routine share — how large that share is depends on your family and your norms, which is why the PoC measures it on your parts instead of promising a percentage. The judgement share stays with the engineer, on purpose.

What the rule sets prepare

Datum schemes

Family datum strategies applied

Your preferred datum strategy per part class, placed as semantic datum features — consistent across the family instead of depending on who annotates.

Standard callouts

Threads, fits, surfaces per norm

The callouts your norms already define — thread series, fit pairings, surface classes — written as machine-readable PMI, not decorative text.

Templates

Note sets & model views

Standard note blocks and view organization per your MBD template — the boilerplate share of every annotation job, prepared in seconds.

Series

Prepared across a family — where it carries

Homogeneous families can be prepared in series runs with a review queue. What carries and what doesn’t, the PoC measures — we don’t promise rates we haven’t seen on your parts.

How it works

Your norms and MBD templates are encoded once, with your senior designers — datum strategies, callout rules per feature class, note sets. The preparation then runs through NXOpen’s semantic PMI APIs on your part templates; AI assists where interpretation genuinely helps (feature classification, matching norm rules to actual geometry), and everything is written as reviewable, editable PMI the engineer completes. On your infrastructure, on-premises or EU cloud.

Honest limits

Rules prepare; they don’t replace judgement. Function-critical tolerances — the ones that decide whether the part works — are engineering decisions, and the workflow is built so an engineer always makes them. A tool that claims to fully annotate your parts automatically is overselling; we’d rather tell you that here than after a pilot.

The rule set is only as good as the norm behind it. Encoding your standards is real workshop effort and part of the PoC — where your norms are silent, the rules stay silent too and the item lands with the engineer. For one-off parts and on-request annotation at the designer’s desk, the conversational authoring assistant is the better fit; this engine pays off where families and templates repeat.

Fixed price — fixed scope

PMI Creation PoC

€16,900 fixed

  • One part family: datum strategy, callout rules and MBD template encoded with your designers
  • Preparation running on your parts, on your infrastructure — engineers complete and release
  • Honest measurement: prepared share vs. engineer share, per annotation type
  • Verification through our separate compliance toolset — no self-grading
  • Recommendation for the next families — based on measured numbers, not hope
Start the PoC conversation

4 weeks · encoded rules are yours either way.

For comparison

All-manual annotation

hours per part

  • Routine callouts placed by hand, part after part
  • Consistency depending on annotator and deadline
  • MBD plans postponed because the math never works

Frequently asked questions

What is rule-based PMI creation?
Rule-based PMI creation prepares the repetitive share of PMI in Siemens NX from encoded company norms and MBD templates — datum schemes per family strategy, standard callouts for threads, fits and surfaces, note sets and views — written as semantic PMI through NXOpen. The engineer adds the judgement-heavy tolerances, adjusts where needed, and releases. It reduces annotation time on the routine share; it does not claim to annotate parts fully automatically.
How much of the PMI can the rules really prepare?
Honestly: it depends — on family homogeneity, norm coverage and how much of your annotation is genuinely rule-like. That is why the PoC measures the prepared share versus the engineer share on your parts, per annotation type, before anyone commits to more. We don’t quote percentages we haven’t measured on your data.
How is this different from your PMI authoring assistant?
Trigger and shape. The authoring assistant is conversational — one part, on request, at the designer’s desk. This engine is rules and templates: encoded once, applied consistently, with series runs where a family carries them. Same norms, same semantic output — pick by how your annotation work actually arrives.
Can it invent tolerances?
No. Every prepared value traces to a rule in your norms or your template defaults; where the norm is silent, nothing is written and the item is listed for the engineer. Function-critical tolerances are deliberately left to the engineer in every case.
Is the prepared PMI machine-readable?
Yes — written through NX’s semantic PMI APIs, attached to faces, consumable by CMM programming, CAM and our separate compliance check, which can verify every released set. Decorative-text PMI is the debt this approach avoids.
Where does it run?
On your infrastructure — on-premises or in an EU cloud under your control. Models and norms never reach a public AI service.

Related engines: AI Geometry Manipulation edits the models these rules annotate, and Parametric Part & Variant Generation creates the family members these rules annotate. Overview: AI-Assisted Geometry Creation.

Where rules run out, an agent can place PMI on request in the live NX session. What it covers today, and what stays with engineers, is on NX MBD with AI.

Take one part your team annotated last week. How much of that PMI was judgement — and how much was routine?

Send us that part and the norm chapter that applies — we’ll return it with the routine share prepared as semantic PMI, and an honest list of what stayed with the engineer.

Talk to an Engineer

PoC as an NX Sprint Plus, €16,900 · one family · on-premises option